Search & Quick Category
Budgets, they are a changin’
The 109th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules implements an amendment, effective from 1 October
The amount by which a Claimant beat its own Part 36 offer is irrelevant
In JLE (A Child by her Mother and Litigation Friend, ELH) v Warrington & Halton
Another case in which the Court rejects comparison between each sides’ costs
In Monex Europe Limited v Pothecary and Kaufman [2019] EWHC 2204 (QB), following the refusal
Lawyers avoid non-party costs order
In Willers & Joyce & Ors [2019] EWHC 2183 (Ch) the Court dismissed an application
Press Release: Panel Success for Phoenix Legal Services
Phoenix Legal Services is featured on Business Live and in Western Mail Business Wales today
No revision of budget absent significant developments
Seekings & Ors v Moores & Ors [2019] EWHC 1476 (Comm) The Defendant applied to increase
Budget that included overstated hourly rate was “improper”
MXX v United Lincolnshire NHS Trust [2019] EWHC 1624 (QB) The Claimant’s solicitor overstated their
A further affirmation of the “high bar” for “exceptional circumstances”
Hammond v SIG plc & Subsidiary Companies [2019] EWHC B7 (Costs) The claim started in
Significant developments and good reasons
Click here to view the full text of our July “Costs Alerter” in which we
Phoenix Legal Services has achieved Cyber Essentials and IASME Certification
As part of Phoenix Legal Services’ ongoing commitment to Cyber Security and compliance with GDPR,